![]() |
| Amsterdam's Prostitutes: Pros and Cons | |||||
| Subject | Comparative statics | ||||
| Topic | Labor markets | ||||
| Key Words | Regulations, taxes, profit, rent, revenue | ||||
| News Story |
In Amsterdam, a new law took effect in the fall of 2000 regulating brothels and other establishments offering sex for hire. For example, the regulations require brothels to provide a certain amount of daylight, presumably to avoid an oppressive atmosphere. Prostitutes are also required to keep their fingernails short so that they do not tear condoms. Further, separate toilets and sinks for men and women are required. It is questionable whether these stipulations are good for business: patrons actually like darkness and long fingernails, it seems, while separate facilities are nonsensical after the transaction. At the same time, self-employed prostitutes were required to be citizens
of a European country and pay taxes. Since about seven out of ten self-employed
prostitutes were African, the number of prostitutes has dropped dramatically.
Offsetting this, now some Dutch women are taking up the slack. Not all
pay taxes, however. This means that big profits can be earned. A room
can be rented for $60 per eight-hour shift, but revenue can reach as much
as $600. (Updated September 1, 2001) |
||||
| Questions |
|
||||
| Source | Susan Taylor Martin, "Regulation brightens light on Amsterdam's prostitutes," St. Petersburg Times, May 28, 2001. | ||||
Return to the Labor markets
Index
©1998-2002 South-Western. All Rights Reserved webmaster
| DISCLAIMER